Archiving101.com; in depth no nonsense information about archiving and related technologies.
21st October 2008

eWeek: 5 Technology Businesses Poised to Boom in the Financial Crisis

According to eWeek the following 5 businesses are poised to boom during the current financial crisis:

Read the full article at:  http://www.eweek.com/c/a/IT-Infrastructure/5-Technology-Businesses-Poised-to-Boom-in-the-Financial-Crisis/

posted in financial, search, eDiscovery | 0 Comments

18th October 2008

15 million dollars to provide a few emails?

Someone needs to talk to these folks and offer them some tools that can do it much cheaper

Source http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27228287/page/1/

Sarah Palin’s office has discovered a renewable resource to bring millions of dollars into Alaska’s economy: the governor’s e-mails.

The office of the Republican vice-presidential nominee has quoted prices as high as $15 million for copies of state e-mails requested by news organizations and citizens. No matter what the price, most of the e-mails of Palin, her senior staff and other state employees won’t be made public until at least several weeks after the Nov. 4 presidential election, her office told msnbc.com on Thursday.

How did the cost reach $15 million? Let’s look at a typical request. When the Associated Press asked for all state e-mails sent to the governor’s husband, Todd Palin, her office said it would take up to six hours of a programmer’s time to assemble the e-mail of just a single state employee, then another two hours for “security” checks, and finally five hours to search the e-mail for whatever word or topic the requestor is seeking. At $73.87 an hour, that’s $960.31 for a single e-mail account. And there are 16,000 full-time state employees. The cost quoted to the AP: $15,364,960.

And that’s not including the copying costs. Although the e-mails are stored electronically in Microsoft Outlook and on backup servers, and although a blank CD-ROM costs only 41 cents at Capital Office Supply in Juneau, the governor’s office says it can provide copies only on paper.

Why? Because lawyers need printouts so they can black out, or “redact,” private or exempted information. That task is more difficult because Palin and her senior staff have used government e-mail accounts for some personal correspondence, and personal e-mail accounts for much of their government correspondence. The photocopies of those printouts will be a relative bargain, only 10 cents a page. A state administrator said he understood that such redaction could be done electronically, but that state offices weren’t set up to do that.

That process of deleting information is likely to be so lengthy that most requestors won’t be able to see the records until well after the next president and vice president are chosen, Palin’s office said.

E-mail sent between the governor’s staff and their private Yahoo e-mail accounts won’t be collected until Oct. 31. Searches will take an additional two weeks, until Nov. 14. And then the legal review of each e-mail will begin. There’s no telling how long that will take, because no one knows how many e-mails there are, wrote Linda J. Perez, administrative director for the governor, in a letter she sent to the state attorney general seeking approval for a delay.

A small victory: Copies of the requests themselves
Msnbc.com did receive from Palin’s office copies of all the public records requests filed since she was inaugurated, and the replies from the governor’s office. Palin took office in December 2006, after seeking office on a platform of clean and transparent government.

The price quotes reveal that Palin’s office has repeatedly tried to charge different news organizations the cost to reconstruct the same e-mail accounts of the governor, her senior staff and other employees. Each time an e-mail is requested, the office quotes the same cost of $960.31 for 13 hours to recover and search each employee’s e-mails.

NBC’s price quote for e-mails sent to Todd Palin: $15 million.

The AP’s price for e-mails between state employees and the campaign headquarters of Republican presidential nominee Sen. John McCain: $15 million.

And the AP again, for e-mails between state employees and the National Park Service (on polar bears, wolves and other topics): $15 million.

The AP’s news editor in Anchorage, Mark Thiessen, told msnbc.com he wasn’t authorized to say whether the AP, a nonprofit cooperative owned by newspapers, planned to pay the $45 million for e-mails.

You can read all the requests for records, and the responses of Gov. Palin’s office in this PDF file.

The employees in the governor’s office have been polite and responsive in fulfilling the request by msnbc.com for all the public records requests and replies. The charge was only $37.70 for photocopies, and the administrative coordinator, Michelle Fabrello, dashed out the door to make sure the package got in the overnight mail delivery.

No free passes
Palin’s office hasn’t always interpreted state law in favor of public access. The Alaska law on public records does not require it to charge any fee for public records, although a fee is allowed if the processing would take five hours or more. The state law says all fees may be waived if the information is used for a public purpose, such as journalism or academic research.

But the governor and the Law Department have been waiving fees only when they are just a few dollars. The state has not been granting requests to waive the fees in the public interest, because it has not been considering those requests.

The records released to msnbc.com show that the state is charging for e-mails at the same hourly rate that it charged before Palin was chosen by McCain on Aug. 29. Only the scale of the requests has changed, and now most requests come from out of state. (State law does not require requestors to be residents.) There are some in-state requests, including the local news organizations, the Democratic party and several citizens. The state employees union, which had filed an ethics complaint against Palin in the inquiry known as Troopergate, was told it would have to pay $88,000 to see e-mails for a list of employees in the governor’s office.

Even before interest in Palin went national, large and small news organizations in Alaska have been dissuaded from seeking public records from her administration, because of the cost. Voice of the Times, a conservative online news site, was quoted a price of $1,250 in May to retrieve e-mails from the accounts of two top aides to the governor, Ivy Frye and Frank Bailey. “Please cancel my request for public records,” editor Paul Jenkins wrote to the governor’s administrator. “We have a limited budget here and paying $1,250 in fees for people who already are on the state payroll is ridiculous.” The newspaper announced this week it will shut down at the end of October for lack of money.

A weekly paper, the Anchorage Press, was told it would have to pay $6,500 for e-mails of Palin and three aides relating to the lieutenant governor. The request was withdrawn, with the newspaper offering the apology. “”Hi Linda - wow, that’s an expensive request I made,” reporter Brendan Joel Kelley wrote to state administrator Linda Perez. “In that case, I definitely don’t want to waste 60 hours of the state’s resources, whether we had the fee waived or not. Consider the request withdrawn. I had supposed/hoped that an electronic records request would be fairly simple.”

A similar situation was settled in Missouri this week. Gov. Matt Blunt agreed to turn over e-mails, at no cost, a year after three news organizations sued for the records. Blunt’s office at first had quoted thousands of dollars in fees for the e-mails about his firing of a deputy general counsel. And in New Jersey earlier this year, a state judge ruled against Gov. Jon Corzine, who wanted to keep private his e-mails with a union leader, his ex-girlfriend. Blunt is a Republican, Corzine a Democrat.

 

State employees overwhelmed
Since Palin was chosen by McCain, state employees have been overwhelmed by hundreds of public records requests sent to the governor’s office and other agencies, said Kevin Brooks, deputy commissioner of the state Department of Administration. There’s been no attempt to delay release of public records about the governor until after the election, he said. Many records requests have been fulfilled, forming the basis of news stories and online archives such as the one growing at governmentattic.org.

But e-mails have been much slower to emerge through the tight window of nine weeks from Palin’s selection until the election.

“I’ve had my information technology folks working nights and weekends. These people are not doing their regular jobs anymore,” Brooks said. “We used to get several records requests for e-mail in a week, or a month. Now it’s literally hundreds and hundreds. It’s gone exponentially off the charts.”

 

 

After msnbc.com challenged apparent double billing, Brooks said he was going to try a new approach: assembling the e-mail files a single time, without charging requestors for that time. But that still leaves the search and copying costs.

“Hindsight is 20-20,” Brooks said. “If we could do it over again, we would have loaded it all up and done these requests.” Still today, he said he was not considering taking a more active approach, posting online for the public all of the governor’s e-mails.

Brooks said he was also rethinking that rate of $73.87 an hour. That cost is not the actual salary of any particular employee. At that rate, an employee would be making about $144,000 a year. Instead, the state has been charging the public and news organizations the same rate that the state Enterprise Technology Services group charges other state departments, as a cost-shifting mechanism on state budget forms.

Alaska law does allow the state to charge for an employee’s time for recovery of records. Brooks said he thought the actual cost would be between $50 and $60 an hour, including benefits and a share of the department’s overhead costs.

As for the estimate of up to five hours to search e-mail for a single word or phrase, Brooks said he was just passing along the estimate from the technical staff.

‘A heckuva lot’ of data
“Why five hours? I’ve asked repeatedly, and that’s what they say it will take,” Brooks said. “We’re talking about 5 terabytes of compressed data. I don’t know what a terabyte is. I just know it’s a heckuva lot.”

Brooks said the state has Outlook on the desktop computers of employees, and that a search of those e-mails would take only a few seconds. But he said most e-mails are on journal servers, which hold e-mail for many employees, and that older or deleted messages might be on archival servers. “The point is we have three sources. We pull from those three and download to a storage device we can search. The process is not simple.”

The courts have given the Palin administration a nudge toward open records. A state judge ruled this week that the state must retrieve public e-mails sent between state accounts and the private e-mail accounts used by the governor and other state employees.

Having a private e-mail account, by itself, is not unusual or unethical, because state employees are forbidden to carry out political activities on government accounts. That’s the reason given for Palin’s habit of punching away on two separate Blackberry devices. But a citizen request earlier this year yielded hundreds of heavily redacted e-mails from the governor’s office, which suggested that Palin and her staff had chosen to move most of their government conversations off the radar, to their Yahoo accounts. News reports then led to public curiosity and the hacking of one of Palin’s Yahoo accounts, for which a college student in Tennessee, the son of a Democratic legislator, has been indicted.

Brooks said the state doesn’t know yet how much e-mail it can recover from Yahoo, in cases where one state employee on a personal account e-mailed another on a personal account.

But the state probably can recover e-mails sent between government and personal e-mail accounts, he said. At least 18 public records requests have been filed for some or all of those e-mails. The requestors include Mother Jones magazine, the AP, NBC, the Anchorage Daily News, the Juneau Empire, msnbc.com, CNN, the Alaska Democratic Party, and several citizens, including Andree McLeod, whose request for the Yahoo e-mails was upheld by the court. Msnbc.com, for example, sought all e-mails sent or received by the governor and a dozen top aides between their state accounts and the personal e-mail accounts of themselves and others. The request included e-mail sent to Palin’s husband, Todd, who has been active in policy and political discussions. The state quoted a price of $11,000 for all the e-mails sought by msnbc.com, which apparently won’t be available until after the election.

To respond to those requests, the state is pulling together all the e-mails sent or received by  51 employees, including Palin, her senior staff, members of the Cabinet, the governor’s assistants and schedulers, and key staff involved with the pipeline proposed to bring natural gas from Alaska’s North Slope, the governor’s office said Thursday. It sought the attorney general’s approval to delay the search of the e-mails until mid-November. Later Thursday, the attorney general, Talis J. Colberg, sent the requestors a letter offering them a chance to be heard before he rules on that request.

‘The hottest thing right now’
Many states have had battles with news organizations and citizens over the fees charged for access to the public’s records, particularly for electronic records such as e-mails.

News organizations have often claimed that the fees are used as a tollbooth to discourage requests, and that requests are delayed until interest in a public issue or candidate has long passed.

Federal law is more favorable. The federal Freedom of Information Act will change in January to penalize agencies for delay. After January, if an agency takes more than 20 days to respond to a request, it can’t charge any duplication fees to individual requestors.

Nationally, access to e-mails of government employees “is the hottest thing right now in open government,” said Lucy Dalglish, executive director of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, a nonprofit that helps journalists obtain public records. “Most judges are interpreting the laws that if you use your private e-mail for state business, that’s a public record.

“Many public officials thought e-mail was more like a phone call, but it’s more like a letter. You type those words, those are like documents. It doesn’t matter if you used a piece of paper from your home or stationery from your office. The form doesn’t matter.”

posted in financial, eDiscovery | 0 Comments

16th October 2008

Sign of the times ? (Part 2) Autonomy closes Ottawa office, releases employees

Yesterday Autonomy closed their Ottawa office and released all of the employees there excluding some sales staff. This means that none of the original Educom development team who wrote the EAS product are now left. The exact reason behind this closure is still unknown, but letting go of development staff generally means that there is a lesser focus on that product.

posted in compliance | 0 Comments

10th October 2008

Sign of the times? Plasmon UK goes into administration


From: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/10/08/plasmon_in_administration/

Plasmon has placed its UK and Europe operation in administration as it negotiates with an investor who it hopes will refinance and take over its core archive business.

Plasmon has said that staff from Kroll’s Corporate Advisory and Restructuring Group were appointed as Joint Administrators on Monday, 6 October.

There are, in effect, two parts of Plasmon: Plasmon Inc, the US operation, which a subsidiary of Plasmon Ltd, the original UK operation. There are several business units involved in Plasmon Ltd., for example in CD and DVD mastering in France, and in UDO media research in Cambridge.

A person familiar with the situation said that about a third of Plasmon Ltd’s staff were made redundant. The software and UDO media teams have been hardest hit. They were judged unimportant compared to the core archive business, and are being closed down during ongoing negotiations with the (presumably) US firm interested in taking over the parts of Plasmon it wants.

Plasmon’s statement said the Administrators: “are continuing to trade the Company’s UK and European sales and marketing division alongside the continuing operation of the Company’s US subsidiary, Plasmon Inc. This enables the ongoing sale and support of Plasmon products worldwide whilst a going concern sale of the business is explored. The Administrators are presently in discussions with a number of interested parties and are hopeful that a sale of the remaining business can be achieved in a relatively short time frame.”

This sounds like the Administrators are in control but, in essence, its Plasmon CEO Steve Murphy’s team who are doing the negotiations with the, potential investor and telling the administrators what they can and can’t use from Plasmon Ltd, the overall parent company. The prospects of the administrators realising any value at all from the unwanted parts of the business are remote.

They in fact believe that there is unlikely to be any value realised at all for Plasmon shareholders. That means Hanover Investment Partners, Amvescap and the other investors have lost their shirts as the US investor gets the core archiving business for nothing, except a large slug of funding needed for product development and working capital, thought to be in the $20 million area.

Investors losing out include BT Pension Scheme Trustees and Royal Mail Pensions Trustees, which will be unwelcome news for their pensioners and savers.

Another person close to events says the administration process is not surprising, it just being part of the process by which a viable Plasmon archiving business can be created. This process could even complete in just a few days time.

Plasmon’s own UDO optical media format’s generational roadmap may now be limited in scope if UDO media research is disbanded.

According to sources, the remaining Plasmon Ltd. staff are clinging on from week to week waiting to see if they will be needed in the new Plasmon.

Watching a viable business trying to emerge from amidst the ravaged remains of an old one under the pressure of dramatic financial events is not a pretty sight. It is amazing, reassuring even, that rescue and refinancing talks are ongoing at all. ®

posted in financial | 0 Comments

8th October 2008

Google now offers 10 year retention on its archiving solution

Today Google announced that it has added new option for archiving messages up to ten years for their Google’s Message Discovery solution, which is based on its 2007 acquisition of email archiving services vendor Postini. This new option is available for a flat fee of $45 USD per user per year, which raises the biggest question of all instantly. Isn’t Google pricing itself out of the market with this steep price?

Not only pricing, but a recent Forrester Research report also attributed relatively slow adoption of email archiving SaaS to network latency in accessing off-site archived messages and searching them for e-Discovery.

Google will continue to offer a one-year retention period for the existing fee of $25 per user per year. Both packages also include spam and virus filtering, policy management tools and, of course, search.

posted in SaaS, storage, vendor selection, competition, eDiscovery | 0 Comments

3rd October 2008

MVP award renewal

Earlier this week I received notification from Microsoft that I was awarded the Microsoft Most Valued Professional award again which makes it 10 in a row now.  Each year one has to qualify again for this award and each year I’m honored that my peers allow me to receive it.

Thanks!

posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

1st October 2008

New Evidence Rule 502 to the Federal Rules of Evidence

On Friday, September 19, 2008, President Bush signed into law S. 2450, a bill adding new Evidence Rule 502 to the Federal Rules of Evidence.  The legislation protects against the inadvertent waiver of the attorney-client privilege or the work product protection.  This law is identical to proposed Evidence Rule 502, as approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 2007.

Now that the bill has been signed by the President, it has been assigned Public Law Number 110-322 by the Office of the Federal Register.  Next, OFR editors will prepare it for publication as a Slip Law, and then include it in the next edition of the United States Statutes at Large.  We will post a copy of Public Law No. 110-322 here, as soon as it becomes available.

Additional information about the legislation may be found on the Library of Congress “Thomas” website, at http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-2450, and on the U.S. Courts’ Federal Rulemaking website.

posted in eDiscovery | 0 Comments